Una concepción pragmatista de los derechos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5347/39.2013.106Keywords:
Consequences of rights, fundamental rights, O. W. Holmes, legal realism, legal rights, C. S. Peirce, pragmatismAbstract
A Pragmatist Conception of Rights
This paper asks what the point is of conferring or recognizing individual rights and claims it is their consequences that are the most important. The claim has the virtue of bringing down to earth the aerial vocabulary of rights and of inviting to determine their content in the most precise and concrete possible way. It is a realist and pragmatist conception of legal rights: realist, because it intends to grasp the real import of having rights; pragmatist, because, in order to do that, it focuses on the consequences of having rights. The paper also shows how this pragmatist thesis can provide an adequate account of fundamental rights.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2013 Isonomía - Revista de teoría y filosofía del derecho
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ITAM, the publisher, has the copyright of published articles and remaining types of publications. Publications are in open access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. That means, among other things, that authors can freely share their articles, once published in Isonomía, on their personal web pages, Academia.edu, etc.. Between formal acceptance and online publication, authors can share the final drafts of their articles. In contrast, authors must seek permission to reproduce or reprint work, and mention, in the first footnote, "previously published in Isonomía, year, n. x, pp. xx-xx"..