Sobre ontología jurídica e interpretación del Derecho
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5347/isonomia.v0i29.237Keywords:
Legal interpretation, legal ontology, legal utterance, interpretative utterance, objectivityAbstract
Ontologically speaking, my contention is that Law is composed of utterances. These legal utterances are elements that comprise Law and precede interpretative activity. The interpretative activity that addresses such utterances, that is, interpretation of Law, focuses on those designated as «interpretative utterances». Interpretative utterances differ from judicial utterances not only by the fact that the former are not legal utterances (insofar as interpretation does not create the elements of law), but also by the fact that interpretative utterances are assertive utterances: they can be true or false, while legal utterances cannot be assertive in most cases, and because interpretative utterances are meta-linguistic with respect to legal utterances.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ITAM, the publisher, has the copyright of published articles and remaining types of publications. Publications are in open access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. That means, among other things, that authors can freely share their articles, once published in Isonomía, on their personal web pages, Academia.edu, etc.. Between formal acceptance and online publication, authors can share the final drafts of their articles. In contrast, authors must seek permission to reproduce or reprint work, and mention, in the first footnote, "previously published in Isonomía, year, n. x, pp. xx-xx"..