La im/parcialidad pericial y otras cuestiones afines. Confiabilidad, desacuerdos y sesgos de los expertos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5347/48.2018.38Keywords:
expert evidence, expert knowledge, impartiality, bias, experts’ disagreements, trustworthinessAbstract
The Im/partiality of the Expert Witnesses and its Relatives Trustworthiness, Disagreements and Biases
At least in civil law systems, when expert evidence is on issue the expert’s impartiality (or partiality) is a recurrent topic, mainly as a criterion used for the assessment of this kind of evidence. For this reason, is worthwhile pay attention to this topic, primarily distinguishing different senses of im/partiality (and their relationship with other relevant concepts); and then take into account the judicial mechanisms whose functioning could contribute to identify a partial expert, from her appointment through her assessment.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Isonomía - Revista de teoría y filosofía del derecho
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ITAM, the publisher, has the copyright of published articles and remaining types of publications. Publications are in open access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. That means, among other things, that authors can freely share their articles, once published in Isonomía, on their personal web pages, Academia.edu, etc.. Between formal acceptance and online publication, authors can share the final drafts of their articles. In contrast, authors must seek permission to reproduce or reprint work, and mention, in the first footnote, "previously published in Isonomía, year, n. x, pp. xx-xx"..