¿Desacuerdo sin acuerdo? Una crítica a la propuesta metalingüística de Plunkett y Sundell

Authors

  • Lorena Ramírez Ludeña Universitat Pompeu Fabra

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5347/44.2016.64

Keywords:

legal disagreements, Dworkin, metalinguistic negotiations, pragmatics

Abstract

Disagreement without Agreement? A Critique of Plunket and Sundell’s Metalinguistic Proposal

The problem of legal disagreements can be approached in different ways. On one version, the problem arises because positivism assumes that legal concepts are criteriological, thus conceiving of disagreement among lawyers as pointless and a mere verbal dispute. Plunkett and Sundell have offered a novel response to this criticism, which holds that it is not necessary to share a concept in order to disagree. In this paper I analyze this response and I offer a number of objections against it.

Published

2016-04-30

How to Cite

Ramírez Ludeña, L. (2016). ¿Desacuerdo sin acuerdo? Una crítica a la propuesta metalingüística de Plunkett y Sundell. Isonomía - Revista De teoría Y filosofía Del Derecho, (44), 39–62. https://doi.org/10.5347/44.2016.64

Issue

Section

Research Articles