¿Desacuerdo sin acuerdo? Una crítica a la propuesta metalingüística de Plunkett y Sundell
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5347/44.2016.64Keywords:
legal disagreements, Dworkin, metalinguistic negotiations, pragmaticsAbstract
Disagreement without Agreement? A Critique of Plunket and Sundell’s Metalinguistic Proposal
The problem of legal disagreements can be approached in different ways. On one version, the problem arises because positivism assumes that legal concepts are criteriological, thus conceiving of disagreement among lawyers as pointless and a mere verbal dispute. Plunkett and Sundell have offered a novel response to this criticism, which holds that it is not necessary to share a concept in order to disagree. In this paper I analyze this response and I offer a number of objections against it.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Isonomía - Revista de teoría y filosofía del derecho
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ITAM, the publisher, has the copyright of published articles and remaining types of publications. Publications are in open access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. That means, among other things, that authors can freely share their articles, once published in Isonomía, on their personal web pages, Academia.edu, etc.. Between formal acceptance and online publication, authors can share the final drafts of their articles. In contrast, authors must seek permission to reproduce or reprint work, and mention, in the first footnote, "previously published in Isonomía, year, n. x, pp. xx-xx"..