Sistemas normativos y conflictos constitucionales
¿es posible aplicar derechos fundamentales sin ponderar?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5347/40.2014.103Keywords:
conflicts of constitutional rights, balancing, fundamental social rights, normative systems theory, material equalityAbstract
Normative Systems and Constitutional Conflicts: ¿Is it Possible to Apply Fundamental Rights Without Balancing?
This paper seeks to answer the following question: is it possible to solve fundamental rights conflicts without balancing? To answer this question we will describe the theory which, to address constitutional conflicts, proposes to reconstruct normative systems. This theory is developed in the work of Moreso, Mendonca and Martinez Zorrilla and presents itself as an alternative to balancing. We will conclude that, even though it might be a good complement to formalize judicial decisions on constitutional matters, it can´t entirely replace balancing, which would always be present underneath. This can be clearly seen in cases where fundamental social rights claim validity, in whose context balancing proves to be conceptually necessary.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 Isonomía - Revista de teoría y filosofía del derecho
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ITAM, the publisher, has the copyright of published articles and remaining types of publications. Publications are in open access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. That means, among other things, that authors can freely share their articles, once published in Isonomía, on their personal web pages, Academia.edu, etc.. Between formal acceptance and online publication, authors can share the final drafts of their articles. In contrast, authors must seek permission to reproduce or reprint work, and mention, in the first footnote, "previously published in Isonomía, year, n. x, pp. xx-xx"..