El problema de los hechos en la justificación de sentencias
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5347/38.2013.118Keywords:
Judicial decision, application of norms, normative justification, truthAbstract
The Problem of Facts in the Justification of Judicial Decisions
This paper presents an argument to support the claim that the descriptive propositions about the facts of the case, which are an ordinary component of contemporary judicial decisions, must meet a truth requirement. This requirement is, therefore, a criterion of justification of judicial decisions. To build the argument, the article resorts to the analysis of the concepts of “judicial decisions”, “application” of general norms and “normative justification”. In addition, it reviews several forms of kelsenian skepticism on the truth requirement and holds that they fail.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2013 Isonomía - Revista de teoría y filosofía del derecho
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ITAM, the publisher, has the copyright of published articles and remaining types of publications. Publications are in open access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. That means, among other things, that authors can freely share their articles, once published in Isonomía, on their personal web pages, Academia.edu, etc.. Between formal acceptance and online publication, authors can share the final drafts of their articles. In contrast, authors must seek permission to reproduce or reprint work, and mention, in the first footnote, "previously published in Isonomía, year, n. x, pp. xx-xx"..
