Leyendo a Hegel como un agnóstico penal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5347/isonomia.57/2022.453Keywords:
Hegel, philosophy of law, punishment theory, penal agnosticism, criminal law, criminologyAbstract
Reading Hegel as a Criminal Agnostic
This article presents a new reading of Hegel’s theory of punishment, based mainly on his Outlines of the Philosophy of Right, by reading it as an agnostic theory of punishment. The article explores the use of contemporary interpretations of Hegel’s corpus, as in Bates and Žižek, in reading Hegel’s theory of crime and punishment, as well as underexplored aspects of said theory itself. The text shows how the internal contradictions in Hegel’s treatment of punishment text are assimilated into any possible concept or application of punishment. The text centers around the analysis of punishment in the section ‘Abstract Right’, making use of Hegel’s other texts as support in the proposed reading, and concludes with a reflection on the consequences of the text’s reading in the latter sections of Hegel’s text, notably in ‘Ethical Life’.
References
Bates, Jennifer A., 2010: Hegel and Shakespeare on Moral Imagination. Albany: SUNY Press.
Brooks, Thom, 2007: Hegel's Political Philosophy: A Systematic Reading of The Philosophy of Right. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
________, 2017: “Hegel on Crime and Punishment”, en Brooks, Thom; Stein, Sebastian (eds), Hegel’s Political Philosophy: On the Normative Significance of Method and System. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 202-221.
Costa, Daniel de V., 2019: “A punição como reconciliação em Hegel”. Revista Eletrônica Estudos Hegelianos, ano 16, n. 27, pp. 149-186. http://ojs.hegelbrasil.org/index.php/reh/article/view/342
Dale, E. M., 2014: Hegel, the End of History, and the Future. Cambridge University Press.
Dubber, Markus D., 1994: “Rediscovering Hegel's Theory of Crime and Punishment”. Michigan Law Review, 92(6), pp. 1577-1621. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1888645
Green, Garrett, 2007: “Translator’s preface”, en Barth, Karl, On Religion: The Revelation of God as the Sublimation of Religion. Londres: Bloomsbury, pp. vii-x.
Hegel, G. W. F., 2017: Enciclopedia de las ciencias filosóficas. Traducción de Ramón Valls Plana. Madrid: Abada Editores.
________, 1993: Fundamentos de la filosofía del derecho. Traducción de Carlos Díaz. Madrid: Prodhufi.
________, 1986: Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts. Berlín: Suhrkampf.
________, 1995: Lectures on Natural Right and Political Science: The First Philosophy of Right. Traducción de J. Michael Stewart y Peter C. Hodgson. Berkeley, Los Angeles, Londres: University of California Press.
________, 2008: Outlines of the Philosophy of Right. Traducción de T. M. Knox. Revisión por Stephen Houlgate. Oxford, Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
________, 2007: Philosophy of Mind. Traducción de W. Wallace e A. V. Miller. Revisión por Michael Wood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
________, 1980: Sobre las maneras de tratar científicamente el derecho natural. Traducción de Dalmacio Negro Pavón. Madrid: Aguilar.
Knowles, Dudley, 2002: Hegel and the Philosophy of Right. Londres; Nueva York: Routledge.
Masson, Cleber, 2020: Direito penal: Parte geral. 14. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Forense.
Merle, Jean-Christophe, 2009: “Hegel’s Negation of Crime”, en Merle, Jean-Christophe, German Idealism and the Concept of Punishment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 107-146.
Pippin, Robert B., 1997: Idealism as Modernism: Hegelian Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pippin, Robert B., 2008: Hegel’s Practical Philosophy: Rational Agency as Ethical Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Puig, Santiago M., 1982: Función de la pena y teoría del delito en el Estado Social y Democrático de Derecho. 2. ed. Barcelona: Bosch.
Quante, Michael, 2004: Hegel’s Concept of Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ruda, Frank, 2019: “A populaça ou o fim do Estado”. Revista Eletrônica Estudos Hegelianos, ano 16, n. 28, pp. 1-21. http://ojs.hegelbrasil.org/index.php/reh/article/view/375
________, 2011: Hegel’s Rabble: Investigation on Hegel’s Philosophy of Right. Londres, Nueva York: Bloomsbury.
Schild, Wolfgang, 2004: “The Contemporary Relevance of Hegel’s Concept of Punishment”, en Pippin, Robert B.; Höffe, Otfried (eds), Hegel on Ethics and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 150-179.
Tunick, Marc, 1992: Hegel's Political Philosophy: Interpreting the Practice of Legal Punishment. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Vieweg, Klaus, 2020: The Idealism of Freedom: For a Hegelian Turn in Philosophy. Leiden, Boston: Brill.
Wood, Allen W., 1990: Hegel’s Ethical Thought. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
________, 2012: “Thom Brooks and the ‘Systematic’ Reading of Hegel”. Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain, Cambridge, n. 66, pp. 16-22. doi:10.1017/S0263523200000471
Zaffaroni, Eugenio R. et al, 2002: Derecho penal. Parte general. 2. ed. Buenos Aires: Ediar.
Žižek, Slavoj, 2014: Absolute Recoil: Towards a New Foundation of Dialectical Materialism. Londres, Nueva York: Verso. E-Book (sin paginación).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Isonomía - Revista de teoría y filosofía del derecho
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ITAM, the publisher, has the copyright of published articles and remaining types of publications. Publications are in open access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. That means, among other things, that authors can freely share their articles, once published in Isonomía, on their personal web pages, Academia.edu, etc.. Between formal acceptance and online publication, authors can share the final drafts of their articles. In contrast, authors must seek permission to reproduce or reprint work, and mention, in the first footnote, "previously published in Isonomía, year, n. x, pp. xx-xx"..
