Democracia y constitucionalismo: distensión deliberativa. Una introducción
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5347/61/2024/786Keywords:
democracia deliberativa, constitucionalismo deliberativo, justicia, legitimidad, control judicialAbstract
Democracy and Constitutionalism: Deliberative Reconciliation. An Introduction
The introduction to this monographic section of Isonomia entitled ‘Democracy and Constitutionalism: Deliberative Reconciliation’ has the following objectives. First, it reconstructs the two components of constitutional democracy––that is, democracy and constitutionalism––, along with the tension that often arises between the two (I). It then argues that deliberation offers a reconciliation between democracy and constitutionalism at both the level of principles (II) and the level of institutions (III). Finally, it presents the contribution to deliberative democratic constitutionalism of each works published in this monographic section edited by Ignacio Giuffré (IV).
References
Juan Carlos Bayón, 2010: Democracia y derechos: problemas de fundamentación del constitucionalismo. El canon neoconstitucional. Eds. Miguel Carbonell y Leonardo García Jaramillo. Madrid: Trotta. 285-355.
Seyla Benhabib, 1996: Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy. Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Ed. Seyla Benhabib. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 67-94.
Joseph Bessette, 1980: Deliberative Democracy: The Majority Principle in Republican Government. How Democratic is the Constitution? Eds. Robert Goldwin y William A. Schambra. Washington: American Enterprise Institute. 102-116.
James Bohman, 1998: Survey Article: The Coming of Age of Deliberative Democracy. Journal of Political Philosophy, 6, 4. 400-424.
Ronald Dworkin, 1996: Freedom’s Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sandra Fredman, 2008: Human Rights Transformed: Positive Rights and Positive Duties. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barry Friedman, 1993: Dialogue and Judicial Review. Michigan Law Review, 91, 4. 577-682.
Roberto Gargarella, 2021: El derecho como una conversación entre iguales. Qué hacer para que las democracias contemporáneas se abran por fin al diálogo ciudadano. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI Editores.
Roberto Gargarella y José Luis Martí, 2005: Estudio preliminar. La filosofía del derecho de Jeremy Waldron: Convivir entre desacuerdos. Derecho y desacuerdos. Jeremy Waldron. Madrid: Marcial Pons. XIII-XLVIII.
Ignacio Giuffré, 2023: Laudatio académica para Roberto Gargarella. Eunomía. Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad, 25, octubre-marzo, 2023. 477-482.
____________, 2024: The Coming of Age of Deliberative Constitutionalism. Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence. Publicado online: 1-30. doi:10.1017/cjlj.2024.14.
Amy Gutmann y Dennis Thompson, 1996: Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Jürgen Habermas, 1995: Reconciliation Through the Public Use of Reason: Remarks on John Rawls’s Political Liberalism. Journal of Philosophy, 92, 3. 109-131.
______________, 2001: Constitutional Democracy: A Paradoxical Union of Contradictory Principles? Political Theory, 29. 766-781.
______________, 2008: Facticidad y validez. Sobre el derecho y el Estado democrático de derecho en términos de teoría del discurso (4ª ed.). Madrid: Trotta.
Alexander Hamilton, James Madison y John Jay, 2010: El Federalista (2ª ed.). Ciudad de México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Aileen Kavanagh, 2023: The Collaborative Constitution. Cambridge University Press.
Cristina Lafont, 2020: Democracy Without Shortcuts: A Participatory Conception of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ron Levy y Hoi Kong, 2018: Introduction: Fusion and Creation. The Cambridge Handbook of Deliberative Constitutionalism. Eds. Ron Levy, Hoi Kong, Graeme Orr y Jeff King. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1-13.
Ron Levy y Graeme Orr, 2017: The Law of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Routledge.
Jane Mansbridge y John Parkinson (Eds.), 2012: Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale. Cambridge University Press.
José Luis Martí, 2006: La república deliberativa: una teoría de la democracia. Madrid: Marcial Pons.
_____________, 2014: Is Constitutional Rigidity the Problem: Democratic Legitimacy and the Last Word. Ratio Juris, 27, 4. 550-558.
Carlos Santiago Nino, 1997: La constitución de la democracia deliberativa. Buenos Aires: Gedisa.
_____________, 2013: Fundamentos de derecho constitucional: análisis filosófico, jurídico y politológico de la práctica constitucional (4ª reimp.). Buenos Aires: Astrea.
Frank Michelman, 1988: Law’s Republic. Yale Law Journal, 97, 8. 1493-1537.
Hanna Pitkin, 1966: Obligation and Consent-II. American Political Science Review, 60, 1. 39-52.
Felipe Rey, 2020: The Representative System. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 26, 6. 831-854.
Cass Sunstein, 1990: After the Rights Revolution: Reconceiving the Regulatory State. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Mark Tushnet, 2003a: Forms of Judicial Review as Expressions of Constitutional Patriotism. Law and Philosophy, 22, 3/4. 353-379.
____________, 2003b: Judicial Review of Legislation. The Oxford Handbook of Legal Studies. Eds. Peter Cane y Mark Tushnet. New York: Oxford University Press. 164-182.
____________, 2008: Weak Courts, Strong Rights: Judicial Review and Social Welfare Rights in Comparative Constitutional Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Jeremy Waldron, 2005: Derecho y desacuerdos. Madrid: Marcial Pons.
Iris Marion Young, 2000: La justicia y la política de la diferencia. Madrid: Cátedra-Universitat de València-Instituto de la Mujer.
Christopher Zurn, 2007: Deliberative Democracy and the Institutions of Judicial Review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
______________, 2011: Judicial Review, Constitutional Juries and Civic Constitutional Fora: Rights, Democracy and Law. Theoria, 58, 127. 63-94.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Isonomía - Revista de teoría y filosofía del derecho
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ITAM, the publisher, has the copyright of published articles and remaining types of publications. Publications are in open access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. That means, among other things, that authors can freely share their articles, once published in Isonomía, on their personal web pages, Academia.edu, etc.. Between formal acceptance and online publication, authors can share the final drafts of their articles. In contrast, authors must seek permission to reproduce or reprint work, and mention, in the first footnote, "previously published in Isonomía, year, n. x, pp. xx-xx"..
