Constitucionalismo deliberativo y control judicial. Un enfoque sistémico
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5347/61/2024/697Palavras-chave:
constitucionalismo, democracia deliberativa, controle judicial, representaçãoResumo
Constitucionalismo deliberativo e controle judicial. Uma abordagem sistêmica
O constitucionalismo deliberativo é um campo emergente que combina a teoria constitucional – e seu ênfase nos limites legais ao poder político – com a teoria democrática deliberativa – e sua ideia da deliberação política como fonte de legitimidade democrática. Essa combinação cria um novo quadro para abordar as questões de legitimidade que surgem nas democracias constitucionais. O artigo contribui para esta área de pesquisa em crescimento, explorando seu potencial para tratar da legitimidade do controle judicial. Em primeiro lugar, o artigo argumenta que esse potencial reside na integração da teoria constitucional com uma abordagem sistêmica da democracia deliberativa e a ideia de um sistema deliberativo multinível. Em segundo lugar, o artigo se baseia nessa integração para explicar a legitimidade do controle judicial como uma instituição integrada em – e moldada por – um sistema deliberativo e representativo.
Referências
Ackerman, B., 1991: We the People, Volume 1: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Alexy, R., 2005: “Balancing, Constitutional Review and Representation”, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 3, pp. 572-581.
Bächtiger, A., Dryzek, J., Mansbridge, J. y Warren, M., 2018: “Deliberative Democracy: An Introduction”, en Bächtiger, A., Dryzek, J., Mansbridge, J. y Warren, M. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1-32.
Bello Hutt, D., 2020: “The Deliberative Constitutionalism Debate and a Republican Way Forward”, Jurisprudence, 7, pp. 69-88.
_________________ 2017: “Deliberation and Courts: The Role of the Judiciary in a Deliberative System”, Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory, 64, pp. 77-103.
Bickel, A., 1962: The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Bohman, J., 2012: “Representation in the Deliberative System”, en Parkinson, J. y Mansbridge, J. (Eds.), Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 72-95.
_________________ 2007: Democracy Across Borders. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
_________________ 1998: “Survey Article: The Coming of Age of Deliberative Democracy”, Journal of Political Philosophy, 6, pp. 400-425.
_________________ 1994: Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity and Democracy. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Cohen, J., 1989: “Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy”, en Hamlin, A. y Pettit, P. (Eds.), The Good Polity. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 17-34.
Dovi, S., 2018: “Political Representation”, en Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/political-representation.
Dryzek, J. S., 2009: “Democratization as Deliberative Capacity Building”, Comparative Political Studies, 42, pp. 1379-1402.
_________________ 1990: Discursive Democracy. Politics, Policy, and Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eisgruber, C., 2001: Constitutional Self-Government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ely, J. H., 1980: Democracy and Distrust. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ferejohn J. y Pasquino, P., 2002: “Constitutional Courts as Deliberative Institutions, Towards an Institutional Theory of Constitutional Justice”, en Sadurski, W. (Ed.), Constitutional Justice, East and West. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 21-36.
Floridia, A., 2018: “The Origins of the Deliberative Turn”, en Bächtiger A., Dryzek J. S., Mansbridge J. y Warren M. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 35-54.
Freeman, S., 2000: “Deliberative Democracy: A Sympathetic Comment”, Philosophy & Public Affairs 29, pp. 371-418.
Friedman, B., 2002: “The Birth of an Academic Obsession: The History of the Countermajoritarian Difficulty, Part Five”, Yale Law Journal, 112, pp. 153-259.
_________________ 1993: “Dialogue and Judicial Review”, Michigan Law Review, 91, pp. 577-682.
Gardbaum, S., 2013: The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gargarella, R., 2019: “Why Do We Care about Dialogue?”, en Young, K. G. (Ed.), The Future of Social and Economic Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 212-232.
_________________ 2014: “«We the People» Outside of the Constitution: The Dialogic Model of Constitutionalism and the System of Checks and Balances”, Current Legal Problems, 67, pp. 1-47.
Giuffré, C.I., 2023: “Deliberative Constitutionalism ‘without Shortcuts’: On the Deliberative Potential Of Cristina Lafont’s Judicial Review Theory”, Global Constitutionalism, 12, 2, pp. 215-233.
Goodin, R. E., 2005: “Sequencing Deliberative Moments”, Acta Política, 40, pp. 182-196.
Gutmann, A. y Thompson, D. F., 2000: “Why Deliberative Democracy is Different”, Social Philosophy and Policy, 17, pp. 161-180.
_________________ 1996: Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
Habermas, J., 1992: Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Harel, A., 2019: “Why Legislatures Owe Deference to the Courts”, Revus, 38, pp. 7-20.
Hart, H. L. A., 1959: “The Presidential Address: Prolegomenon to the Principles of Punishment”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 60, pp. 1-26.
Hübner Mendes, C., 2013: Constitutional Courts and Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Klatt, M., 2019: “Judicial Review and Institutional Balance: Comments on Dimitrios Kyritsis”, Revus, 38, pp. 21-38.
Kong, H. y Levy, R., 2018a: “Deliberative Constitutionalism”, en Bächtiger, A., Dryzek, J. S., Mansbridge, J. y Warren, M. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 626-640.
_________________ 2018b: “Fusion and Creation”, en Levy, R., Kong, H., Orr, G. y King, J. (Eds.): The Cambridge Handbook of Deliberative Constitutionalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.1-14.
Krause, S. R., 2008: Civil Passions: Moral sentiment and Democratic Deliberation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kumm, M., 2019: “On the Representativeness of Constitutional Courts: How to Strengthen the Legitimacy of Rights Adjudicating Courts without Undermining their Independence”, en Landfried, C. (Ed.), Judicial Power: How Constitutional Courts Affect Political Transformations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 281-291.
Kuyper, J. W. 2016: “Systemic Representation: Democracy, Deliberation, and Nonelectoral Representatives”, American Political Science Review, 110, pp. 308-324.
_________________ 2015: “Democratic Deliberation in the Modern World: The Systemic Turn”, Critical Review, 27, pp. 49-63.
Kyritsis, D., 2017: Where Our Protection Lies: Separation of Powers and Constitutional Review. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lafont, C., 2020: Democracy without Shortcuts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Levy, R., Kong, H, Orr, G. y King, J. (Eds.), 2018: The Cambridge Handbook of Deliberative Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levy, R. y Orr, G., 2016: The Law of Deliberative Democracy. London: Routledge.
Mansbridge, J. y Rey, F., 2015: “The Representative System”, unpublished paper presented at the 13th National Congress of the Association Française de Science Politique, Aixen-Provence.
Mansbridge, J. et al., 2012: “A Systemic Approach to Deliberative Democracy”, en Parkinson, J. y Mansbridge, J. (Eds.), Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-26.
Mansbridge, J. , 2011: “Clarifying the Concept of Representation”, American Political Science Review, 105, pp. 621-630.
_________________ 2009: “A Selection Model of Representation”, Journal of Political Philosophy, 17, pp. 369-398.
_________________ 2003: “Rethinking Representation”, American Political Science Review, 97, pp. 515-528.
_________________ 1999: “Everyday Talk and the Deliberative System”, en Macedo, S. (Ed.), Deliberative Politics, pp. 211-242.
Martí, J. L., 2006: La república deliberativa: una teoría de la democracia. Madrid: Marcial Pons.
Michelman, F. I., 1987: “Law’s Republic”, Yale Law Journal, 97, pp. 1493-1537.
Nino, C.S., 1998: The Constitution of Deliberative Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Owen D. y Smith, G., 2015: “Survey Article: Deliberation, Democracy, and the Systemic Turn”, Journal of Political Philosophy, 23, pp. 213-234.
Parkinson, J., 2006: Deliberating in the Real World: Problems of Legitimacy in Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pettit, P., 2010a: “Representation, Responsive and Indicative”, Constellations, 17, pp. 427-428.
_________________ 2010b: “Varieties of Public Representation”, en Shapiro, I., Stokes, S., Wood, E. J. y Kirshner, A. (Eds.), Political Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 61-89.
Pitkin, H., 1972: The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: California University Press.
Rawls, J., 1993: Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
_________________ 1955: “Two Concepts of Rules”, The Philosophical Review, 64, pp. 3-32.
Raz, J., 1986: The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Rey, F., 2023: “The Representative System”, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 26, 6, pp. 831-854.
Rosanvallon, P., 2011: Democratic Legitimacy: Impartiality, Reflexivity, Proximity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sunstein, C. R., 2017: “Deliberative Democracy in the Trenches”, Daedalus, 146, pp. 129-139.
_________________ 1996: Legal Reasoning and Political Conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tremblay, L., 2005: “The Legitimacy of Judicial Review: The Limits of Dialogue between Courts and Legislatures”, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 3, pp. 617-648.
Tushnet, M., 2016: “New Institutional Mechanisms for Making Constitutional Law”, en Bustamante, T. y Gonçalves Fernandes, B. (Eds.), Democratizing Constitutional Law. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, pp. 167-183.
_________________ 2009: “Dialogic Judicial Review”, Arkansas Law Review, 61, pp. 205-216.
Valentini, C., 2019: “The Legislative Assembly and Representative Deliberation”, The American Journal of Jurisprudence, 64, pp. 105-123.
_________________ 2022: “Deliberative Constitutionalism and Judicial Review. A Systemic Approach”, Revus, 47, pp. 1-27.
Vermeule, A., 2011: The System of the Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Worley, J. J, 2009: “Deliberative Constitutionalism”, BYU Law Review, 9, 2, pp. 431-480.
Young, A., 2018: “Dialogue, Deliberation and Human Rights”, en Levy, R., Kong, H., Orr, G. y King, J. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Deliberative Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 125-138.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 Isonomía - Revista de teoría y filosofía del drecho
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ITAM, responsable de la publicación de la Revista, tiene los derechos de autor sobre los artículos publicados y el resto de las contribuciones. Las publicaciones están en acceso abierto y bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Esto significa, entre otras cosas, que los autores pueden compartir libremente sus artículos, una vez publicados en Isonomía, en sus páginas web personales, Academia.edu, etc. Entre la aceptación formal y la publicación en línea, los autores pueden compartir los borradores finales de sus artículos. En cambio, los autores deben pedir permiso para reproducir o reimprimir el trabajo, y mencionar, en la primera nota a pie de página, "publicado previamente en Isonomía, año, n. x, pp. xx-xx".
